Dispel the Distraction: Prioritize Service Over Division
We have taken cognizance of Henry Tanya’s article, which endeavors to draw unwarranted comparisons between Distinguished Senator Jarigbe Agom Jarigbe and Senator Eteng Williams. This piece is a transparent attempt to manufacture controversy and sow discord where none exists.
By selectively fixating on Senators Jarigbe and Eteng, the author blatantly disregards the fact that Cross River State is represented by three senators. Such a myopic comparison is not only inequitable but appears to be a calculated effort to foster division between the two legislators. It is patently illogical to juxtapose a lawmaker with a decade of legislative experience in the National Assembly, such as Senator Jarigbe, against one with merely two years in the Senate.
The underlying premise of this so-called analysis reeks of bias, and it is highly inappropriate to single out one legislator from a cohort of eleven for such scrutiny. Moreover, the piece exhibits a glaring failure to appreciate the broader governance dynamics of both the state and the nation. Introducing internal party politics into this discourse is both needless and counterproductive. Senator Jarigbe remains wholly uninterested in being co-opted into such divisive theatrics.
If the concern is truly about service to the people, then all lawmakers should be appraised impartially based on their collective contributions and tangible impact, rather than through the prism of political antagonism. We strongly caution Henry against weaponizing Senator Jarigbe’s performance as a vehicle for advancing personal ambitions or stoking unnecessary discord. The senator should not be dragged into the internal machinations of the APC.
In conclusion, rather than perpetuating divisive rhetoric, we must redirect our focus toward fostering unity and meaningful dialogue. The people of Cross River State deserve leadership anchored in progress and accountability, not political distractions. Scrutiny should be predicated on service delivery and legislative efficacy—not party affiliations or parochial interests.
